Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whatubeenwaitin4
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatubeenwaitin4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although this album does appear to have been released, it is most certainly a bootleg. It surely fails WP:NALBUMS as it has not received considerable, extensive or significant coverage from reliable sources (the one used earlier in the sentence being the exception) as far as I can tell. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Per the source above. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:20, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google News and Books found nothing useful and I would have suggested adding the album and redirecting to Outkast discography but there are links noting the release date as 2008 and 2010. Aside from being a compilation album, it appears it's not significant to their discography so delete. SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as completely lacking independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.