Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Happened in Skinner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What Happened in Skinner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looking through the current sources I'm mostly seeing blogs and social media. There's a bit of student news, local news, and a nomination for an award, but not much else. The best source by far is this source in THR. I did a WP:BEFORE with "a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search" as well as a Google Scholar search. I was unable to find anything else. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Entertainment, Games, and Oregon. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Other than the first source (the Hollywood Reporter), the rest used in the article are non-RS. I've found [1] and [2], should be just enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Agreed that those three sources alone qualify this article for notability (and thanks for finding, Oaktree!). Per Wikipedia's guidelines on notability: "A local source is a source of information that is marketed to a limited geographical audience. These include [...] local television and radio stations [...] They are valid in establishing notability if they provide in-depth, non-routine, non-trivial coverage of the subject," which the cited articles do.
• Keep: The Hollywood Reporter source already in the article, combined with the additional sources found by Oaktree b, each contains multiple paragraphs of significant, independent coverage that is needed to meet the WP:GNG, despite some of the souring having a local flavor. This article needs some work but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Let'srun (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.