Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welsh-Jamaican
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Welsh-Jamaican (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is incoherent and unsourced. There seem to be no sources or references to establish the notability of this segment of the Jamaican population, and the article itself is low on factual, verifiable information, and presents a mish-mash of OR supported by POV statements and anecdotal evidence. Drmies (talk) 03:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there's nothing that's verifiably notable here. No evidence that the conjunction of these two ethnic groups has attracted attention. JJL (talk) 03:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unreferenced POV original research essay-like aritcle. There's a lot of "probably"'s, "likely"'s and "could"'s in this Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this article has some obvious POV issues and possible original research/essay. Tavix (talk) 04:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this essay. That said I know a few Welsh-Jamaicans and they are lovely people. Agathoclea (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just like everyone said: it's unsourced, POV, and not notable. When will these non-important articles about small groups in a different country ever end? Lehoiberri (talk) 07:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.