Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WellMed Medical Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 14:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WellMed Medical Management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was primarily written to advertise the company, which does not even serve the entire United States, just Texas and Florida. It is not related to any significant or notable subjects either; the founder does not count. Given the amount of activity and non-free content that was added by the creator of this article, the creator most likely broke NPOV writing the article.

Other than its presence in these two states, WellMed, its founder, and its "significant" awards and subsidiaries and acts of philanthropy, are not notable enough to be on Wikipedia. If I removed everything non-notable and not properly cited from this article, nothing except the header would be left at all. Even the footnote references are just links to the homepages of websites that are not even part of the press.

Let us remind such companies that Wikipedia is **not** a place to advertise or promote non-notable services and products, even if it is "big business." Longbyte1 (talk) 22:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches only found a few links and nothing actually better convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N as well as the fact that this seems like an attempt to use Wikipedia as a billboard. Cawhee^Talk 02:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.