Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welcome To Sludge City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete nancy ^(talk) 18:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome To Sludge City

Recommending deletion as non-notable. This is an album by a band (Annotations Of An Autopsy) whose article was speedied under CSD A7, released by a small non-notable label. Neither the band nor the label have articles, but speedy deletion for the album was declined because CSD A7 doesn't cover albums. ⇔ ∫Æ_S dt @ 02:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn; plenty of web hits but only one via news: [1]. JJL (talk) 02:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No sources given in article. Black ngold29 06:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable album by a non-notable, red link band. Fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Should've prod'ded it. tomasz. 14:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the deletion log of Annotations Of An Autopsy, which shows more than one deletion, I felt AfD was the way to go. With AfD, it will stay deleted upon recreation, thanks to CSD G4. With PROD, recreation is contesting the prod, and we'd get to do this all over again. ⇔ ∫Æ_S dt @ 18:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.