Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weeve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weeve

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see evidence for notability here, besides some local publicity./ 'DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 20:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Improve There seems to be a fair number of sources that haven't been tapped into. For example.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nowa (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks significant coverage to establish notability. The sourcing in the article is primary or to local papers which may or may not be a reliable source. The Vancouver Observer will publish news for a charge. The Digital Journal article above is a little bit better. But overall, there is not a lot out theere. -- Whpq (talk) 17:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Huffington Post, Metro News, Tech Vibes, Digital Journal 1, and Digital Journal 2. SL93 (talk) 00:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.