Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne William Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne William Scott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO, 22 G-hits including WP and mirrors for "Wayne William Scott", 37 for "Wayne W. Scott". This has been speedily deleted three times (once under the two variations noted above plus once as "Wayne Scott"). Appears to be autobiographical, this version was created by User44130 (talk · contribs), their only edit. While it appears speediable to me, the multiple re-creations and the longer history of this version seem to warrant an AfD discussion. Delete. Accurizer 15:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, because speedied articles aren't eligible for G4. Fails WP:BIO miserably, fails the Google test, and isn't verifiable. PTO 16:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom and add notice to not re-create--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 16:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as all of above. roundhouse 16:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, non-notable. Postdlf 22:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as recreated content and watch for potential sockpuppet activity. Dr. Submillimeter 12:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable bio, and as recreated content from Wayne Scott and Wayne W. Scott. Sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry looks likely here: does anyone know how to check whether User44130 (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet of this bio's subject, User:Pastorwayne? --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 18:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.