Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wavetec (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per WP:G5. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wavetec

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Published by UPE User:Mathieu Vouillamoz when it should go through AFC. Sourced with PR advertorials. Complete failure of WP:CORPDEPTH, in parts due to no in-depth article. Previous AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wavetec attached. J. D. S. Kumar (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is not a local small company. It's working since 1980s, expanded to several countries and we can find a lot of coverage related to them (Independent genuine coverage and not just press releases). The article used sources from media channels like BBC, Express Tribune, Gulf News, Khaleej Times so the nominator claim that it is "Sourced with PR advertorials" is invalid. While getting idea about Wikipedia guidelines and rules, I once found an article WP:THREE and although it's just a essay but makes sense.
- And I don't know if this is the right place to discuss but I saw a strange pattern of the nominator "J. D. S. Kumar" because the account is created just 20 hours ago, did only 4 edits and all of them are related to nominating my articles/edits for deletion or labeling me as a paid editor. Can't be a coincidence. Mathieu Vouillamoz (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the sources mentioned in the article and doing a Google search about the company, it looks notable. 203.135.47.9 (talk) 12:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It has references from:

Meets notability guidelines. VincentGod11 (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are a lot of references available. It's notable. Billymufc (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The references above do mention the company, but I don't think they quite hit WP:CORPDEPTH, as pointed out in the nom. PianoDan (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.