Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water insight spectrometer with three radiometers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 11:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Water insight spectrometer with three radiometers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

product description of a non notable equipment, with no majjor advances over routine products of that sort. A clear advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 08:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. The previous AfD, also nominated by DGG was closed as no consensus in 2014. wumbolo ^^^ 12:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The coverage does not raise to the level of independent notability. A publication about comparing a number of different measuring devices (ref 1) isn't sufficient, and the other sources are just usage notes; we don't take these as sufficient for software (for which cases with this kind of referencing pop up rather frequently at AfD), and I don't believe we do for meatspace tools either. This strikes me as a product promotion page with application examples. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.