Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water Sports (video game)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water Sports (video game)

Water Sports (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, no sources, and just about no content than two lead sentences. Neither company connected to the game is notable as well, and the currently remaining ashes resulted from an originally biased-written article. Lordtobi () 15:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 10:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article may barely skate by GNG as there are [1] and [2] reviews, but given the game's lack of any real impact and abysmal reviews as shovelware, I think it exists best as a data point in List of Wii games. --Odie5533 (talk) 14:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I haven't looked to see if there are other sources, but "abysmal reviews" aren't a justification for deletion. Neither is "real impact". --Izno (talk) 15:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Without other sources being found, I consider this game an edge case for the GNG, and so am taking into consideration its impact as a video game to determine its notability. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had few meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. I'd redirect to the parent developer article, but I think it's going to be deleted. czar 07:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.