Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WaterRower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WaterRower

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertisement for non-notable device by non-notable company DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, could not have said that better. Delete. Legacypac (talk) 04:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – below are some sources that provide significant coverage. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

See also

The Wall Street Journal (subscription required)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - nice brochure.--Rpclod (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- overly promotional; such content belongs on the company web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At first glance, there appears to be more than adequate independent sources establishing notability. Here is a dailymail.co.uk article but then I find it is essentially requoting the WSJ. Similarly, this article from TIME does the same. And then an article in stern.de does the same. It looks very much like a WSJ-led ad campaign. I'm open to changing my mind if another source can be found but at this point in time, I'm leaning towards Delete. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 20:28, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.