Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Saire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lady Jane (film). Discussion shows the article does not meet the notability guidelines, but a redirect to the only film where there is a significant role is sensible. Davewild (talk) 08:41, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Saire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In trying to expand this two-sentence stub, it became apparent that this actor probably isn't notable enough for a Wiki article. I couldn't find anything in reliable sources except mentions in lists of credits. Moswento ^talky 14:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He does have 14 acting credits on IMDB, several links from Wikipedia articles, and a significant part in one fairly well known film, Lady Jane (film). PatGallacher (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- 14 acting credits doesn't really seem that many to me, and one significant role isn't a sufficient indication of notability (WP:NACTOR suggests "multiple" such roles might be). Moswento ^talky 07:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although he hasn't got that many credits, he did have a significant role in Lady Jane, which I think just about qualifies him. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- One significant role isn't a sufficient indication of notability per WP:NACTOR. One decent source might push him to borderline notability, but I haven't found that source yet. Moswento ^talky 07:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 07:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NACTOR and WP:GNG, possibly redirect to Lady Jane (film). One or two roles in significant films doesn't do it, especially when they're not starring ones. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 16:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Clarityfiend. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. He's a bit part actor. Szzuk (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.