Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanda Curtis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 00:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wanda Curtis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No notable contributions to the genre. The award category, Starlet of the Year, of the Venus Award is not significant. The rest are nominations. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:44, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 01:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to 1999 Venus Award.Guilherme Burn (talk) 13:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 18:59, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The claimed trade show award is not a reliable indicator of notability, is sourced only to the performer's promotional website, and is not documented by the official site. In the absence of any other substantive reliable sourcing, there's virtually nothing here to sustain a BLP. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.