Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallonia national football team
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wallonia national football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:V and WP:N, no reliable sources except a listing from their league indicating that they exist, no apparent sportive accomplishments, no media coverage to be found. When they have played a match the world knows about, we can restore. Stu.W UK (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or, if the team really is of any significance, rename to Wallonia football team. Wallonia is a cultural region of Belgium. I lived in Belgium for 23 years and nobody thinks Wallonia is a nation.Alarics (talk) 16:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. —94.196.163.252 (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename. I totally agree they're not a nation as stated by Alarics. They're still part of a notable league (Nouvelle Fédération-Board) - Mgm|(talk) 13:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article could do with expansion/improvements but I'd say it was notable because of the NF membership. With regards to a rename it is worth pointing out that being a nation (Scotland, for instance) and a sovierign state (United Kingdom) is not the same thing. I think you could find quite a few Belgians who would tell you Wallonia was a nation. Having said that I'm not particularly opposed to a rename. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - completely non-notable, as is the whole of the Nouvelle Federation Board. No verifiable sources that such a team actually exists, let alone multiple non-trivial content in Reliable Sources. - fchd (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - like fchd, I don't believe any of the NF Board teams are notable and many, like this one, only seem to exist as theoretical concepts on paper -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any significant coverage in independent sources per WP:N. In fact, I can't find any coverage of any matches that they may have played! Not notable, I afraid. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.