Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkie bits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Takara. Courcelles (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Walkie bits

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for well over a decade. Zero in-depth coverage either currently, or found in searches. Was boldly, and correctly, imho, redirected to Takara, where it is mentioned, by 162 etc.. But that redirect was contested, without comment or improvement. So we we are here. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Takara, per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Restore redirect unless better sources are found and added. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. Mccapra (talk) 18:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.