Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wahooly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wahooly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a defunct social-network start-up company. The available coverage is typical notice of a start-up proposition, and then of its attempted rebrand and revised proposition the following year, and then closure the year after that (involving a merger into another start-up which has no article, so not a redirect target). The most detailed discussion that I am finding for either brand name is an article early in its lifespan in the Star-Tribune ([1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) but that is effectively home-town start-up coverage and not, I think, sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 07:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- insufficient sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. No long-term significance or societal impact. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article fails to meet requirements for notability, references fail WP:NCORP, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 21:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.