Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Homecoming
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WWE Homecoming
Pure fancruft like RAW Family Reunion. All it was was RAW's 2005 season premiere. Only thing notable was the fact that it was RAW's return to the USA Network. Anything notable coming from that show isn't deserving of it's own page and should only be with WWE RAW. --James Duggan 05:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; markcruft. - Chadbryant 07:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- DiegoTehMexican 11:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete maybe could be a footnote in the main RAW article, but that's it. Cornerbock 13:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing notable that deserves it's own article. — Moe 14:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 15:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, overhyped professional wrestling show. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 19:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fancruft begone. RFerreira 01:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. THL 05:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- fhb3 08:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with RAW Family Reunion. It's an annual event.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.74.18.111 (talk • contribs)
- Delete per nom. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it did mark a significant point in the history of Raw. Spike TV even tried to bleep out any mention of it when they switched over to showing TNA wrestling, IIRC. kelvSYC 04:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per excellently worded nom. -Kubigula (ave) 15:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Aaru Bui DII 10:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.