Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WSHR
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. New sources added which establish notability. (non-admin closure) —Tom Morris (talk) 09:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WSHR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability - the only reference is noting a change in output, otherwise completely uncited. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep articles on federally licensed radio stations broadcasting unique programming (i.e. not retransmitters, which this station does not seem to be) are generally considerd inherently notable. FCC ref has been added to the article. RadioFan (talk) 02:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. RadioFan (talk) 12:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep: Licensed station under the FCC, several references, carries unique local programming. In a word, notable. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A 6000 watt federally licensed station which originates some of its programming is de facto inherently notable per the outcome of countless AFDs in recent years. Edison (talk) 20:35, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Especially with it being owned by a school system. School-owned stations are, sadly, a dying breed. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:39, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.