Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WNYT (internet radio)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per the snowball clause. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WNYT (internet radio)
- WNYT (internet radio) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod, the reason was No indication of why this internet radio stream is notable. Procedural nomination, no opinion from my side. Tone 11:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notability asserted and links establish same. WTF is with all these "procedural nominations -- no opinion" watsisnames? Get some dusters people, take a position or stay outta AfD goddamit. X MarX the Spot (talk) 11:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Keep - If it is exclusive to the University, stick it back into the actual page. But if that's not acceptable, keep would be still ok. Dengero (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It is a legitimate college radio station from a legitimate college (NYIT). It has been so for over 40 years on carrier current, cable radio, and Internet radio. The only reason it is not an over-the-air radio station is because it is in the jam-packed media market of greater New York, where any frequency allotments were taken decades ago. –radiojon (talk) 18:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Procedural keep as nom gives no reason to bring to AFD, no opinion from my side... DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 22:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per User:Dennis Brown. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 23, 2008 @ 01:54
- Keep as notability is asserted and at least potentially proven by wikilinks and 44 years of history, more references from reliable third-party sources would be appreciated, no reason for deletion in nomination should set this on course for a speedy keep. - Dravecky (talk) 02:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.