Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voskos Greek Yogurt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Voskos Greek Yogurt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, no rationale left. PROD reason was " Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. All that's in the article is pure promotional fluff." Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Advertising for a specific brand'''DGG''' (at NYPL) (talk) 17:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, found a few brief mentions in non-primary reliable sources, however none of them provide significant coverage of the subject of this AfD, and the few brief mentions, if added up together, do not add up to significant coverage. Therefore, the subject fails WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Improve I believe that this article should not be deleted whatsoever. If we worked together, we could publish an amazing entry is a matter of an hour or two. The company is relevant, but the content needs to be revamped. This article needs to not be deleted, and instead it needs to be improved and restored. Coolboygcp (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How does that address any of the concerns? The company fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG as clearly as the fact grass is green. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We can improve this article with reliable sources. However, all I can find are press releases and passing mentions. The best source I was able to find was this article from the Seattle Post Intelligencer and that's barely beyond a mention. -- Whpq (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete clearly not notable --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.