Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Metyolkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vladyslav Metyolkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was discussed in 2017, and due to low participation (with one of three editors being the creator, a single-purpose account) it reached no consensus. Very little has changed since, and it's still not clearly a notable subject. Renominating in the hopes of a more robust discussion. ~TPW 16:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~TPW 16:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The original discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladislav Metyolkin and did not get automatically populated due to the name change. ~TPW 16:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ukraine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Cyrillic script always presents a problem when trying to establish notability. This article, however, seems to be a direct translation from the user who created the Russian and Ukrainian versions. It is a SPA in English. Many of the links go to various pages of http://fond-kd.ru . The article of a living artist is stale, and no way to update it in English. Dead link to the artist's web site I am not finding sources for the unsourced biography section. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Question - Is it canvassing to ping the editor who nominated this for deletion the first time? --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm going to have to say d*lete on this article. The biographical section is entirely unsourced. The sourcing for the rest of the article (which reads like a resume/CV) is referenced to a lot of primary sources, calendar listings and what looks like art sales or upload sites. It seems they are a run-of-the-mill landscape painter like hundreds of thousands of others around the world. WP:MILL There is nothing that seems to make this painter notable; it just seems like he is "doing his job" making paintings. Netherzone (talk) 14:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.