Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Yadav (civil servant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vivek Yadav (civil servant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. One among the lakhs of district magistrates in India. Fails WP:BIO Uncletomwood (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete minor official. Not an elected official and not a particularly high ranking or prominent person. Civil servants should only exceptionally be notable. MLA (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete can't find evidence that the subject passes WP:BIO. The sources cited (which to me appear to be pretty comprehensive) don't give significant coverage to the subject. While it is possible for very senior civil servants to be notable, the job doesn't exactly lend itself to media coverage and lower ranking ones are far less prominent. Hut 8.5 21:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.