Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vithoam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vithoam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced; evidently a WP:HOAX. Online search for the term, including GBOOKS, only turns up a non-notable Australian games studio. Ruby Murray 05:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - apparent hoax, as I'm seeing zero coverage for this term as described in the article. Gongshow talk 06:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, consider a G3 Speedy. A web search reveals no relevant hits, merely an apparently unrelated indie software project. Zero returns from Google Books, zero returns from scholar. I think this is obviously a hoax, or something so badly mistransliterated and out of context as to be indistinguishable from one. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.