Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Meena Phagi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As an aside, looking at this article, it looks like the AFD tag was removed and replaced at least 5 or 6 times. Since so much of the article content appears to be false, if this article gets recreated yet again, I recommend salting the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Meena Phagi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A textbook example of WP:REFBOMB. Previously deleted under A7, now the references are almost exclusively about Anushka Sen (?) for some reason. Most of the refs don't discuss Vishal Meena at all, e.g., reference 6's title states Vishal Meena replaced in 'Apna Time Bhi Aayega in the reflist but the actual ref's headline is Anushka Sen replaced in ‘Apna Time Bhi Aayega’: While producers cite unprofessionalism, actress claims she quit on health grounds (accidental mistake?). this ref discusses Vishal Aditya Singh instead of Vishal Meena. But there is not a single reference discussing Vishal Meena Phagi, the actual subject of the article, significantly, I could not find any per a WP:BEFORE and the extremely minor roles fail WP:NACTOR. VickKiang (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 02:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Unfortunately, I AfDed this via Twinkle instead of Page Curation, so didn't check the time this page was created, as a result I should wait 15 minutes to tag but I only waited 13 minutes. Apologies for this oversight, thanks.
VickKiang (talk) 02:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looking into the history of the article User_talk:Meenavishalmeena183 to see how it was developed. I do not see this entry as meeting the requirements for inclusion as to quality, independence COI, or process Flibbertigibbets (talk) 03:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject of BLP does not seem notable enough for inclusion on WP. There also seems to be a significant conflict of interest between the primary editor & the subject. Unburnable (talk) 08:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - autobiography on a non-notable person. I can't find even a smidgen of coverage. Even if this is somehow kept, the fraudulent references which actually relate to Anushka Sen need to be removed. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with this comment, most of the references are completely unrelated WP:REFBOMB. VickKiang (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanicruft. SteelPanMan (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly not notable and doesn't meet any notability guidelines that I'm aware of. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.