Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VirtualDubMod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VirtualDubMod

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources. FuFoFuEd (talk) 08:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VirtualDubMod, although aging, is still an important and well known video editing tool. It's used by many and definitely needs an article on Wikipedia. The article may need more references, but they can be easily found on the net, and some are already there. I'm opposed to deletion. Jaho (talk) 01:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. When googling for virtualdubmod vs virtualdub, the article on VirtualDubMod was the first hit, proving its relevance—at least for me. DVdm (talk) 10:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Wikipedia being the 1st google hit generally proves the lack of notability. FuFoFuEd (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously. Wikipedia seems to be the first google hit for just about everything notable. Unless YMV, for instance, try this and this :-) - DVdm (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.