Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Greville

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 12:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Greville

Virginia Greville (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. All the sources provided are primary. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to List_of_ambassadors_of_Australia_to_Spain(based on it being her last posting) on this one. I see a little sporadic press coverage (https://dsf.newscorpaustralia.com/couriermail/subscription/) consistent with what I’d expect for an ambassador and she’s certainly accomplished. HOWEVER… All biographical information not from the government I managed to turn up myself seems to come from schools she has attended (https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2015/05/uq-alumnus-named-ambassador-spain, https://law.anu.edu.au/alumni/alumni-profiles/virginia-greville, https://www.stmargarets.qld.edu.au/125/125-notables/virginia-greville) . So I’m not seeing in-depth coverage from a secondary/RS here. Fails Wikipedia:BIO absent such sourcing. Jo7hs2 (talk) 01:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
She was also ambassador to Chile (And other South American countries), so I don't support redirect in this case. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s a fair point. I could see justifying the redirect based on it being her last posting and the largest country she was ambassador to, but it could also be confusing.Jo7hs2 (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Bilateral relations, Andorra, Spain, Australia, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per nom, Ambassadors are not inherently notable. None of the sources are really inline with WP:GNG // GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Per WP:NPOL, as Greville held the regional position of Chief Executive Officer of Trade and Investment of Queensland. She has a notesworthy diplomatic career, being ambassador of at least 9 different countries. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Being chief of a government agency does not meet WP:NPOL. LibStar (talk) 03:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them. --NoonIcarus (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Being ambassador to several countries does not confer automatic notability, many of these countries she was a non resident ambassador. LibStar (talk) 03:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    A "notesworthy diplomatic career" is not the same as a career that meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG and does not meet WP:NPOL.Onel5969 TT me 00:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.