Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinyl Station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vinyl Station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:BAND. The best coverage I can find is this interview with a local newspaper; they also get a few sentences in this review of a Rob Thomas show for which they opened (not sure about the quality of this source). If this is all there is, then there isn't nearly enough significant coverage. Lennart97 (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Phoenix New Times appears to be RS where there are multiple references of the band. Chirota (talk) 22:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chiro725: It's just one source though, while WP:BAND and WP:GNG require multiple pieces of in-depth coverage. And while I don't doubt that Phoenix New Times is reliable, it's also very much local, and this particular interview really doesn't seem to exceed routine coverage. I think we need at least one piece of in-depth coverage from a non-local RS to justify a keep. Lennart97 (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - PNT is usually considered a reliable source, and I would consider it so in the music/arts/and sports fields. But Lennart97 is right, it's only a single source. I can't find anything about them in the Arizona Republic even, let alone non-local papers. Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.