Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vin Suprynowicz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 22:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vin Suprynowicz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The article presently has no citations containing WP:RS-based significant coverage of the subject, and my WP:BEFORE search across multiple search engines failed to locate any. His appearance on one state ballot as a vice-presidential candidate on a third party-ticket in the 2000 election is insufficient to establish notabilty per WP:NPOL as well. Sal2100 (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Politics, Libertarianism, Connecticut, and Nevada. Sal2100 (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Politicians, Arizona, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable subject. Very little coverage exists. Upper Deck Guy (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.