Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Village Reconstruction Organization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Village Reconstruction Organization

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated through draft space after an earlier speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising. Still fails the notability guidelines and looks like promo based on own, related or unsuitable sources. The Banner talk 08:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG. See, for example, [1] and [2]. Many more sources available at Google Scholar and Google Books. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 09:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 10:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)BillHPike (talk, contribs) 09:59, 10 March 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly notable, substantial in-depth coverage and discussion in several reliable and academic sources. See for example this and this in addition to those mentioned by Billhpike. The page will need considerable editing for tone, excessive reliance on its own publications and so on. Windey is also notable, but I'm not convinced that we need an article on both. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.