Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vildane Zeneli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vildane Zeneli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources are all WP:PRIMARY. This needs an indication if she has been signed to an agency of note in the US. Her foray in music is negligible, a search throws up largely gossip around 50ct. Karst (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No notability established and the only sources available are press releases. Nymf (talk) 10:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Albanian sources (such as Telegrafi and Gazeta Express) are flooded with articles about her, see for example [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. None of these are press releases, as far as I can see. --Λeternus ^(talk) 18:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Many thanks for those sources. I had looked at them in detail and they are problematic I'm afraid. They are essentially based upon the Twitter and Instagram account posts that Zeneli has put out over the past few months. They tend to refer to plastic surgery and 50ct, and has a strong air of WP:GOSSIP. This article needs WP:RS, it tried to look for an interview somewhere in Albanian, but found none. Karst (talk) 09:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No relevance in Albania either, no one really knows her and she has only been in Albania once. Not relevant anywhere or any sources. Kakakola (talk) 22:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC) im not sure how to format this

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At best delete for now as my searches found some sources here and there but nothing explicitly good so delete for now and start again when sourcing is better. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Searches turned up nothing notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another case of attention-seeking, and not attention-getting, fails GNG per WP:ROUTINE and WP:SENSATION which say something about "tabloid journalism" Kraxler (talk) 15:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.