Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijaya Rahatkar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vijaya Rahatkar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mayor of Aurangabad, 6th biggest city of Maharashtra. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sources to show notability. I think someone needs to take a look at say some of the Mayor of Flint, Michigan to see if they are notable. Many of those articles are poorly sourced.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even in large cities, mayors aren't handed an automatic notability freebie just because they exist — the notability test for a mayor requires them to be the subject of significant press coverage enabling us to write a substantive article about their political importance. But the only references here are a brief acknowledgement of her birthday, two short blurbs announcing her appointment to roles without contextualizing anything about the significance of her work in those roles, and one short blurb about her "interacting" with a "cross section of women", which is not enough coverage to get her over the bar. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage of subject by the sources which are reliable WP:BASIC. GargAvinash (talk) 04:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 16:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.