Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/View London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 06:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

View London

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for a non-notable website/review guide. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:PRODUCT. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 20:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 02:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Advert. Their are a dozen or so View websites, for example View Birmingham. The umbrella company doesn't have a page, I'm not sure why this particular page got on wp. No refs. A web only company...Szzuk (talk) 20:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.