Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 22:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A listful of red links based only on the official webpage of our subject. Let's discuss to put TNT under the building to blow it off and then make a shorter article (without the red links for not notable items) based on third party reliable sources.Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A high level government agency going back over 60 years. Instead of proposing TNT, the nominator should instead use a machete on the existing article. A Google Books search shows that the agency's publications are widely cited in academic works about Southeast Asia. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, got no machete. I have been criticized for removing WP:OR chunks from articles and try to avoid attracting reactions now. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Please wait for me to repair/complete/fix them. Newone (talk) 03:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, afd is not a tool for clean-up. --Soman (talk) 18:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The nominator has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:12, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.