Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Sanz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Sanz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines Geejayen (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable musician failing both WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.Celestina007 (talk) 23:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Bushranger What was not clear specifically about this AFD? It clearly fails both WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG and a lengthy search has produced nothing to prove otherwise. Please advise. Thank you. Geejayen (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I felt like it might benefit from a little more time for people to look into it; there is no deadline and one more week's chance won't harm. That said, if anyone else feels it should go ahead and be closed, I won't object to it. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.