Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Kewat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 16:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vicky Kewat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. This person is mentioned in only one of the cited references (scroll the staff list), which is not an independent source. The rest of the references are entirely spurious: they do not support any assertions in the article, or even mention the person. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing here at all suggesting the needed solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have removed all the fake references which didn't support a single fact and the primary source which only mentions the name. This seems to be a hoax or an attempt at promotion. Delete per WP:NOTPROMO. Also not notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete I suspect this is a vanity article if it's not a hoax. 1.125.48.81 (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note to prove a conflict of interest here. See the other two AfD's in this group. 1.125.48.81 (talk) 10:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no reliable sources currently included in the article and my searching didn't turn any up either. Notability hasn't been established when judged against WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Just because this person might be known in India, it doesn't mean it should have a Wikipedia article as there are almost no sources that can confirm his significance. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.