Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vickey Deb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vickey Deb

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was self moved form AFC to main namespace having been thrice declined. A sample of the references shows primary sources (interviews with the gentleman) and nothing that has convinced me that he passes WP:NACTOR. When he does he may have an article about him here. Fiddle Faddle 13:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 13:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 13:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"AFC Draft" Apart regular interview on daily journal, I have added article in leading daily journals and online news/newspapers from The Telegraph and Times Of India discussing on his contributions to a field of entertainment in form movies and daily television soaps . Other reputed movie site like imdb , moviebuff, bookmyshow, cinestaan classify him as actor, why is the notion being set otherwise. People already classified as actor Srabanti Chatterjee on wikipedia have mentions on their page with him as co-actor for his role in famed movie Dhrisyantar. What further are we looking for to qualify him as WP:NACTOR.Saket.agrahari (talk) 19:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete speedily, preferably. It's all, for lack of a better word, bullshit. Utterly non notable vanity spam. Praxidicae (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable Devokewater @ 15:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Page was created by an SPA and none of the references pass GNG. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.