Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Việt Khang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Việt Khang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This strikes me as a WP:BLP1E thing. He was arrested and jailed for some song. It got a little press at the time. Article overinflates the so called worldwide movement generated. He was mentioned as an example of a political prisoner in relation to a petition but this article overplays his significance in that event and overplays what was simply one (well signed) petition. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 17:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in any case until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 05:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- not enough in-depth lasting coverage to show that they meet WP:GNG. Right now I agree that this is a clear case of WP:BLP1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.