Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verge (gaming) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verge (gaming)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not locate any reliable, independent sources for verification. Probably does not meet our notability requirements for inclusion. (WP:V, WP:N) Marasmusine (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per lack of reliable, usable coverage. --Teancum (talk) 14:01, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliable sources, and per common sense that a game engine used in absolutely zero notable games is extremely unlikely to itself be notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – There was nothing I could find, and it doesn't look like there is anything notable produced by this game engine, either, which doesn't help much at all. –MuZemike 07:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.