Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbling

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seems like we have enough evidence and arguments for notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verbling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously speedy deleted. It has been recreated by WP:SPA and likely WP:COI User:Conway2166 , and tagged for notability issues by User:Staszek Lem. I've taken a look and I concur that the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. The refs are mostly business-as-usual from your usual press-release republishing startup coverage sites. Only one source from VentureBeat ([1]) looks like reasonable coverage... but I don't think a single blog (and this is what VB) is makes much difference here. It is WP:CORPSPAM written for promotional purposes. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane talk 01:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  17:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I'm fine with it at this point. I added the refs in places where machine translate could be fairly certain the ref was actually supporting the content. I left out Hürriyet, since it looks a bit click baity. TEN THINGS YOU NEVER KNEW YOU WANTED TO CLICK ON BUT DO! TimothyJosephWood 19:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.