Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venkatesh mandir nepal

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, based on the improvements that have been made. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Venkatesh mandir nepal

Venkatesh mandir nepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unambiguous essay. Google results are affiliated websites and travel websites. Mr. Guye (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment While the Hindu temple may or may not be notable, the current text appears to be a copyright violation from [1]. Stubbed down for now. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 17:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 19:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 19:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a stub, the Kathmandu Star is a RS.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I have added 1 more reference. Delibzr (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.