Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venkat Viswanathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Venkat Viswanathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

one of the executives of company that is borderline notable at best -- see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LatentView and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pramad Jandhyala . The interview used as the principal reference is primarily promotional. Writing articles about a borderline notable company and each of its founders is usually a promotional technique. No other notability outside the company. DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 04:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 04:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as News, Books, browser and WP:INDAFD all found links but nothing to suggest better at this time. SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 16:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while there is a good Times of India article, that's about it for good sources. That single feature article is not enough for WP:GNG. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON applies here. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.