Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veda Vyasapriya Swami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Veda Vyasapriya Swami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Iskcon swami. Wikid ^as© 04:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 19:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 19:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find any coverage of him in independent, reliable sources.--Gaura79 (talk) 11:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable and well sourced article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per ism schism.Pectore^talk 19:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All sources are ISKCON sites except for a passing reference in a news article that does no more than list him as a speaker at an event. Searches away from these sites produce little or nothing. Mangoe (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mangoe is right, there are no independed or reliable sources to support notability. Wikid ^as© 20:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ism and Pectore failed to demonstrate that sources re independent (they are not) and reliable(they are not RS), and provide substantial coverage (again not even that). Wikid ^as© 06:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.