Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varun Singh (Indian Air Force Officer)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. The overall consensus herein is to redirect to 2021 Indian Air Force Mil Mi-17 crash. North America1000 16:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Varun Singh (Indian Air Force Officer)

Varun Singh (Indian Air Force Officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's proposed he's notable for surviving a crash.. WP:NOTNEWS DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I never said his notability depends on surviving an air crash and you are distorting this subject by a mile. He is a high-ranking officer who already established notability by receiving the Shaurya Chakra from the President of India himself (and already had a Wikidata item in 2019, three years before before I wrote the article).
I have never, ever stated his notability (which is anyways rising as we speak) is dependent on surviving an air crash. I advise you not to distort the intentions of other editors to make them look ignorant of the rules. I have readWP:NOTABILITY over and I think this article is supported by WP:SUSTAINED (He has already gotten notability in the past). Dunutubble (talk) 14:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DGG - Apologies if my previous reaction seemed a bit too harsh. What I am trying to say is that I never proposed he was only notable for surviving a crash. There are more reasons why I think this article has notability. With all due respect, Dunutubble (talk) 14:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a bit unusual but I’d say delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankiethesexaddict (talkcontribs) 05:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*I have struck this now-blocked, not HERE user's contribution because it contains no sources and no intelligible reasoning.—S Marshall T/C 14:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not currently notable in his own right, as a crash survivor or otherwise. He might still die of his injuries as well. This article is simply unnecessary at present. WP Ludicer (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i would say Merge with the article of the crash Jazzy Jazz Jr (talk) 07:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But it wouldn't fit well into that article, even if we tried. Many additions to that article end up getting cut or deleted, and anyway, this subject (Varun Singh) has become relevant enough. Dunutubble (talk) 15:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even if someone dies, that doesn't make them non-notable. Almost every news article about the crash has now become an article about Singh. Dunutubble (talk) 15:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.