Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van de León

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Van de León

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. No reliable source hits on Google and GNews. Google News Archives and GBooks show that he is indeed a prolific actor as there are several listings of his filmography with Sampaguita. However, the lists do not provide any insights on any of de Leon's awards or notable works within Philippine cinema that could justify notability. Lenticel ^(talk) 01:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Philippines. Lenticel ^(talk) 01:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Is there a corresponding article in the subject's mother language? If it is accepted that he is a prolific actor, it could be argued that the second limb of WP:NACTOR is made out. And if he has indeed won awards, then I think further research is warranted. I don't feel I'm in a position to cast a vote at this time, but would suggest a re-listing to see if anything further can be found. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
95% of the WP:RS on anything related to the Philippines during the 20th century and beyond on the internet is in English. If you can't find RS in English, you won't find anything else. Howard the Duck (talk) 04:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.