Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valpuri Urpiainen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valpuri Urpiainen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable biographical subject. PepperBeast (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subject requested specifically at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's History/Requested articles. 76.98.184.25 (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's an article about her in the Finnish wiki, so she is notable.2600:1002:B008:D1B1:B562:AE0C:4E32:E056 (talk) 04:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are more sources available for those who read Finnish.173.59.126.44 (talk) 13:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Inclusion in the Finnish Wikipedia is irrelevant, but the editors of the National Biography of Finland have deemed her notable enough for inclusion. How about moving this little placeholder non-article to Draft:Valpuri Urpiainen for the time being, to see if somebody is prepared to expand it beyond the current size of less than a single line? --Hegvald (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRIME. Sub-stub containing BLP nothing more than an ancient criminal allegation of dubious historical value. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Eggishorn: It is a useless sub-stub, which may be reason enough to delete, but the woman has presumably remained dead for the more than 300 years that have passed since she was executed in 1692 (from the Swedish and what little I can understand of the Finnish article). --Hegvald (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hegvald:, thank you for the correction. It is clearly not a BLP violation and I've updated my !vote to reflect. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TNT, unless expanded with meaningful content before closing, but with no prejudice against recreation of a better article. Inclusion in the National Biography of Finland shows that Finnish historians have seen her as a person of historical interest. --Hegvald (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.