Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley of the Jedi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valley of the Jedi

This article is an in-universe plot repetition without any references from multiple reliable sources, and as such is just a copy of the information to be found in articles on the Star Wars expanded universe. It is duplicative and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does not have independant notability. So I support removal of the content, by either deleting and subsequent recreation as a redirect, or by only redirecting; probably to Star Wars: Darth Bane: Path of Destruction, which, as best I can tell (a claim to how poorly the article is written) is the relevant book. If not, redirect wherever it's from. As a side note, the book article's synopsis should be rewritten. seresin ^{wasn't he just...?} 00:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets no current criterion for deletion. WP:PLOT only applies to plots, and WP:FICTION lacks consensus. Any overlap with other articles is appropriate for this complicated fictional universe. DGG (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has no reliable references, so it does not pass verifiability, which is not disputed or a guideline. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & Fantasy-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:FANCRUFT. The Star Wars Wiki more than covers this subject. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 05:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; this subject does not meet Wikipedia verifiability criteria, and Wookieepedia seems to have it covered adequately already. *** Crotalus *** 04:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable fancruft. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: non-notable WP:FANCRUFT. Mh29255 (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per above. Showers (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Star Wars Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II, in which the location most prominently appears. --EEMIV (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable fancruft, location is not notable in the real world. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 02:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.