Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valappottukal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to draft. "Shows up as the first result on a Google Search" is not a reason for keeping, and apart from that there is 100% consensus that the article should not be kept. (And incidentally, a Google Search for what? Valappottukal showing up as the first hit on a Google search for "Valappottukal" wouldn't mean much.) Two editors have supported draftification rather than deletion, nobody has opposed that suggestion, and since keeping as a draft for the time being can't do much harm, I shall do that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valappottukal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Coverage in independent reliable sources not found. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 00:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly notable. Shows up as the first result on a Google Search. You should probably withdraw the nomination. FertilityWizard (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – Hi FertilityWizard: check out WP:LOTSOFGHITS. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Name those independent reliable sources so they can be used in the discussion. Ajf773 (talk) 08:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – seems to be a case of WP:TOOSOON, would it be possible to move to the creator's draftspace so when the film does come out and receive attention it can be recreated? I know this line of thought might violate WP:CBALL but it was just an idea to put out there. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – As above, WP:TOOSOON... movin to the draftspace sounds like a good idea! Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.