Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VR Sharma (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 05:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VR Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO - much of the coverage is WP:MILL, routine coverage related to companies: press releases etc, and does not take the subject pass WP:BASIC or the WP:GNG. It should be noted that this article was previously deleted via AfD in September 2020. The article was re-created by the original editor in February 2012 without addressing the issues that it was previously deleted for. Dan arndt (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the person is a well-known business personality & deserves to be on Wikipedia as people keep searching for details about him over the internet.Rohitnwi (talk) 05:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The consensus to delete in September 2020 was based on numerous !voters who failed to find significant coverage that would meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Barring a major notability-conferring event in the last six months (and none is indicated), it's likely that the subject continues to fail to meet those criteria. Per the nom and the arguments in the last AfD, his press coverage continues to be more of the same routine passing mentions. Notability on Wikipedia is rooted in significant coverage by reliable, independent sources, not search frequency. DanCherek (talk) 13:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per dan, and nomination. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.