Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIT University Jaipur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" opinions argue that universities are automatically notable, but they cite no policy or guideline that says so. They also do not attempt to rebut the argument for deletion that there is insufficient reliable coverage in secondary sources to base a neutral article on. Faced with unrebutted strong "delete" arguments, and weak "keep" ones, I have to find a policy-based consensus to delete. Sandstein 19:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VIT University Jaipur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn’t find enough news that will clarify that this university is notable. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 02:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Accredited degree-awarding university. We invariably keep these. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In agreement with Necrothesp. A poor case of nomination. - Hatchens (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOLS. Given sources are either related or listings. A WP:BEFORE did not give any in-depth sources. The Banner talk 13:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Where is it written that all accredited degree awarding universities are notable? WP:school says for profit education organisation are commercial organisations and should follow that. And that would be company related guidelines. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions have enough coverage to be notable, although that coverage may not be readily available online. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. -Hatchens (talk) 03:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there is a difference between ‘most’ and ‘all’. May not be readily online means could be elsewhere. But it doesn’t tell us to make assumptions on notability. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 12:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. as per Necrothesp. UA3 (talk) 05:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.