Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VConnect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 21:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

VConnect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article, no indication of notability. Google search does not turn out to give any significant result. Ireneshih (talk) 05:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Are you familiar with wikipedia's GNG criteria at all? This article obviously doesn't fail notability (web) criteria. All the references cited are from credible and popular dailies. plus The social media accounts of the subject all have what can be considered as a "cult following". Google search didn't give any significant result? are you sure you used the same google search I just used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie Tubers (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.